I was flipping through the Saturday paper and I came across this story that made me uncomfortable. Apparently if you have a GM car with OnStar, it might be spying on you even if you don’t subscribe to OnStar:
OnStar, known for connecting drivers to live operators who can provide directions or summon emergency help after an accident, starting in December plans to collect data from people who discontinue the service unless they specifically ask for the connection to be severed.
Among the details that would still be collected are speed, location and other data from global positioning system satellites, raising potential concerns from privacy advocates.
It gets even worse:
The data collected may be shared with or sold to third parties for any purpose after identifying tags are removed, the OnStar policy states. Such uses might include research into public safety or traffic services, according to the policy.
Sorry, that’s a #fail in my books. The folks at OnStar had something to say about that:
“We have never sold any personally identifiable information to any third party,” Joanne Finnorn, vice president for subscriber services at OnStar, said in a statement.
Sorry, that’s a #fail too. The fact that you haven’t sold personally identifiable info really doesn’t make me feel any better about this. The fact is that unless I opt out, you could be collecting all sorts of info that I perhaps don’t want in the hands of a third party. Even before this popped up on my radar screen, I personally have had zero interest in paying for OnStar if I owned a GM vehicle. Quite honestly, I didn’t see the value in it to justify the price they want me to pay to have it. The thought that they may be collecting data even after I stop subscribing to the service (as all GM vehicles come with some sort of free trial period) really does nothing to make me want to buy a GM vehicle. It also makes me want to rethink the positive review I gave the Chevy Cruze.
I’ll say this to GM. If you want consumers to trust you, then you need to do a better job of protecting personal information. What’s described in this article doesn’t come close to doing so. Until you start do so, you’re not on my car buying list, not to mention the lists of others out there.
Hey Mozilla! Stop Rolling Out Frequent Major Firefox Updates!
Posted in Commentary with tags Firefox, Mozilla on September 29, 2011 by itnerdIs it just me, or every couple of months there’s a new major release of Firefox? Version 7 of the open source browser has just hitting the streets this week. For those of you keeping score, here’s the release schedule for all the major versions of Firefox:
So. after Firefox 4 hit the streets, it’s been a release every two or three months. This is insane. Developer are going to get run ragged testing their web apps with each new release of the browser. Not to mention that enterprises who may want to use Firefox would run into the same issue.
The problem is that it may get worse.
The word on the street is that updates may become even more frequent:
“Yes, I absolutely think in the future we will shorten the cycle – releases. “We have some work to do to make 6 weeks smooth from a process, tool, and product side. When we get 6 weeks down to a science we can shorten as needed.”
Lovely.
My advice to Mozilla. Stop the insanity. Releasing major Firefox updates weeks apart is insane. Slow down and allow users to actually adopt the browser and only release bug and security fixes when needed. That I think would help you to gain marketshre. After all, most users don’t see the benefit of shoving all these updates down their throats so frequently as they only surf the net with a browser and watch YouTube videos. You might want to keep that in mind.
1 Comment »